 |
|
|
|
|
Interesting
and formidable challenges...
The process of any reconstruction of an antique structure presents
interesting and formidable challenges, the solutions to which must
be determined by the initial clearly set goals of the endeavour
- its 'philosophy' as it were. Nonetheless contemporary distinctions
(and confusions) over the approach to the project were carefully
considered. We were not set to conserve the sad memory of the building
that had stood derelict and abandoned since 1944. Its vestigial
VenetoCatholic elements were of importance but could not take precedence
over the acquired Jewish character into which these elements had
been absorbed. What was foremost in our approach was to ensure that
the building become structurally sound, that it reflect emphatically
its Jewish character, and most important, that it be potentially
of liturgical use. Parallel to this was the need to ensure that
it be able to playa role in the greater life of Hania as a resource
centre. All evidence of additions and detail work in plastering
that had been part of its Jewish character were retained as were
the obvious Venetian elements dating back to the 15th century.
In
certain areas, e.g. the Lauder Garden, discoveries made there under
the floor of the former women's section and in the excavation to
the south demanded significant changes in the approach to the project.
The discovery of the fragmented sections of the pediment now in
its original position over the Rothschild Gate was a major find,
which corroborated the observations of Rabbi Evlagon concerning
its original character at the time of its erection in 1900.
The
following pictures and running commentary are an outline of the
project and its evolution from 1996 until its near completion in
August 1999.
|
 |
 |
|
|
The
south-west gothic arch on the interior
|
|
|
The
badly set roof beams...
In this photograph the badly set roof beams are apparent as is the
disparate character of the walls. The Venetian piers and gothic
arches were stable and solid whereas the curtain walls were light
and of little if any structural value. The brick fill in the arch
and the window were both put in by squatters after the II World
War, To the left can be seen a vertical iron 'support' dating back
to the 19th cent, and used to tie the curtain wall to the gothic
arch. Essentially all this had done was to increase pressure.
Rubble
in the north courtyard with the entrance to the synagogue to the
left and the door leading into the shamash's lodge in the centre.
|
 |
 |
|
|
The
south-east arch and fill
|
|
|
The
doorway and its supporting stones...
The doorway and its supporting stones was part of the work carried
out in the 17th cent. Beyond it can be seen the present Lauder Garden
as it was in 1996. Prior to W/W II the portion just beyond the door
to the stair base was covered bya domed structure that served as
the women's section and visual access to the synagogue was through
a lattice set in the gothic arch.
|
 |
 |
|
|
The
interior looking to the east, after re-building
|
|
|
The
new roof...
The interior looking to the east shortly after re-building the east
pediment and re-setting the oculus in position. The new roof was
laid upon specially treated planks of wood and over this a layer
of lead sheeting, On top of this were laid tiles, Between the two
arched widows dating from the 17th cent can be seen the base of
the former Ehal.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
To
make this area distinct...
After
cleaning the grave of R. Eskenazi we sank a long N/S trench in the
centre of the upper tree-planted portion of the 'garden'. The banana
cluster was removed, the olive tree moved to a new spot against
the east wall and the pomegranate and walnut tree left as they were.
The trench revealed the other three graves dating from 1821 to 1854.
Around them a separating and purely symbolic wall had been constructed
so as to make this area distinct from the actual synagogue in conformance
with Jewish Law. This entire area has been now cleaned and the graves
given prominence, Unfortunately all of them save the graves of R.
Eskenazi and that of R. Joseph Shalom had been ravaged. The stone
dedication stone of R. Baruh Shalom had been shattered and some
of the fragments were found in the course of the excavation. The
other stones were not found. The graves are of some interest as
the earliest of them conform to a very ancient type, the surface
of which was covered with plaster and then the head-stone embedded
in the end. As we found good evidence of their original form and
manner of plastering these have been restored.
Under
the spot where the olive tree is now planted we discovered the fragments
of two carved wooden rimonim (finials used to decorate the supports
of the Scroll of the Law). These had been carefully wrapped in what
appears to have been a Torah cover of green silk satin with gold
decorations. There were also found several minute fragments of Hebrew
printed paper. At a later time we found as well a large deep clay
pythos and in its bottom fragments of human bones but nothing else.
This pythos and the other deep stone lined hole in which the rimonim
had been found were repositories for religious objects and books
that had long lost their use a gnize. The bones were certainly from
one or the other of the graves. These have been appropriately buried
in the plot under the central carved dedication stone of R. Baruh
Shalom.
|
 |
 |
|
|
The
small room above the shamash's lodge
|
|
|
A
small room...
A small room above the shamash's lodge had at one time functioned
as a subsidiary mehitza or secluded viewing area for women. As in
the case of the original main women's section on the south- east
where the gothic arch had been incorporated, in this instance an
arched window that still retained its grill was left intact. Access
to the room was by means of an outer stair.
Work
on the Lauder Garden began in clearing away the rubble from the
site of the women's section, In the course of this we cut down to
the original floor and discovered a support that connected to the
side walls and was apparently the base of the stairs leading to
the upper section. As this area was cleaned a long marble slab still
coated with a layer of white washed plaster along its base came
to sight It lay directly under the former stair and had been given
a separating wall about it The 'double wall' mentioned by Evlagon
in describing the women's section was constructed in order to separate
and possibly obscure the grave of R. Hillel Eskenazi who had died
in 1710.
|
 |
 |
|
Back to:
Introduction
on the Synagogue structure
Back
to:
Reconstruction
and Re-birth
Back
to:
Synagogue
page
Back to:
Welcome
page
|